Security leaks are bad, and that's something Bush has clamped down on hard. After all, we can't have people knowing the truth can we?
So perhaps it's a little strange that he's been authorising leaks himself, although this only comes out in a court case on perjury and obstruction on a CIA leak case, as reported by the International Herald Tribune.
I'm not too worried about how many false facts Bush gave to "justify" the invasion of Iraq, but I would like to know why he was so keen on the invasion. What is it's real purpose?
No comments:
Post a Comment